გაეცანით კონსოლის სიახლეებს

Like, desire, and also the inhibition of opinion off intimate alternatives

Like, desire, and also the inhibition of opinion off intimate alternatives

Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, M. G., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Development and you may Individual Choices, 29(2), 119–126.

Cross-sectional research regarding intimacy, interests, and you can connection: Research the latest assumptions of your own triangular idea out-of love

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The spot out-of connection for the people mating. Post on General Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An excellent. (2002). Sites contradiction reviewed. Log from Social Activities, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A personal technology one minimizes personal wedding and you can psychological well-getting? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, R.Meters., & Industries, J. Meters. (2001). Count, time, and time of marriage ceremonies and you may divorces. Newest Society Profile, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Impression top on the carrying out bad: Personal reviews contained in this personal matchmaking. Record of Identity and Personal Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A good., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Log regarding Character and you can Social Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. Good., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you can glamorous selection: The new changed mindset off relationship maintenance. Progression and you may People Decisions, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential investigation away from disagreement and you can accord when you look at the troubled and nondistressed marital lovers. Record out-of Asking and you will Health-related Therapy, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. A great., Eco-friendly, Good. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationships creation on the internet: What’s the large attraction? Log away from Social Items, 58(1), 9–29.

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The key benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization therefore the design out of pleasure inside the romantic relationship. Journal out-of Identity and you can Societal Therapy, 70(1), 79–98.

Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-comparison aim into the romantic relationship: A type of globally enhancement and certain verification. During the P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Facts ents about examination of partners communications (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge University Force.

Intrasexual vigilance: This new implicit cognition off romantic rivalry

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the consumer-specialist bond from the contact from accessory concept. Psychotherapy: Idea, Research, Habit, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. escort services Dayton (2005). The brand new social keeping track of system: Improved susceptibility to help you personal cues as the a transformative reaction to social exception to this rule. For the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The newest social outcast: Ostracism, personal exclusion, rejection, and you can bullying (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Psychology Force.

Enter, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). Global and you may particular relational patterns regarding experience of societal affairs. Log away from Personality and you will Public Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An excellent., Tran, S., ). Accessory and information seeking to when you look at the personal matchmaking. Personality and you can Personal Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and particular accessory representations from inside the adulthood: Can there be a romance?. Journal From Personal And private Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. An effective. (2001)mitment and matchmaking restoration components. For the J. Harvey & An effective. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic close matchmaking: Restoration and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A great. D. (2000). Projection privately feeling certainly one of spouses as the a purpose of the fresh new resemblance in their common experiences. Character And you may Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Results of salience of extrinsic benefits on taste and you may enjoying. Journal out-of Identity and Public Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.